The Defense Department Debate on Military Blogging
"The Department of Defense (DoD) is split into two basic camps on military blogging." contends Michael Goldfarb, editor of Worldwide Standard.com , a Weekly Standard blog. According to Goldfarb:
One camp believes that in-theater blogging is too serious of an OPSEC [operation security] risk, arguing that our enemies and their sympathizers can gain access to troop movements, deployment schedules, base defenses, etc., by reading military blogs. The reaction is to try and keep their finger in the information dike by banning sites like YouTube, Myspace, and Blogspot, separating soldiers from the New Media's common tools.The other camp, of which General [William] Caldwell and General [David] Petraeus are members, views blogs as a tool that can be used to the military's advantage. In an age where the United States finds itself engaged in a variety of smaller wars and counterinsurgencies, conflicts that will be won or lost in the halls of Congress instead of on the battlefield, Caldwell views the intensely personal war-stories flooding the Internet as critical to the war effort, helping to sustain the American public's stomach for a protracted fight.
Goldfarb said, "They're also critical in fighting our media saavy enemy, who use contacts in global news outlets to widely and rapidly communicate their message of jihad to the world.
If you want to read more, see "The Internal War Over Blogs."







Comments