In critiquing "The Authority Question," National Journal media critic William Powers' January 23, 2007, lament about old media's "loss of authority, "poet, playwright, screenwriter, and essayist" Jayne Lyn Stahl asserts in the January 27, 2007, edition of The Netherlands-based Atlantic Free Press:
At a time when journalism, as a profession, has faced the gravest threat since the days of Joe McCarthy,[link added] it's ludicrous to think that a Washington, D.C. columnist, and former reporter for The Washington Post wastes his time with what amounts to little more than a bad pun. Instead of attempting to slap an "R" rating on what we read, "restricted to professionals only," the focus should be on this administration's attempts to contain the free flow of information, as well as its ongoing assault on a free press.
"Moreover, Stahl continues, "whoever invented blogging obviously didn't intend it to be letter perfect, but to address the kind of exclusive, glass ceiling, professional elitism which is the subtext, and foundation, of "A Question of Authority." The fact that relative unknowns like myself can find their spontaneous ramblings posted on the same page as those of "establishment" writers like David Mamet, and Nora Ephron [links added]shows, if nothing else, that one of the wonderful things about authority, in a democracy, is its capacity for change, and those who question that the concept of authority frequently morphs haven't studied history.
"What's more," Stahl contends, "anyone who resists change should be collecting fossils, and not working in news."
To read the entire essay, please see "The Powers That Be." By the way, I found Stahl's views compelling.
Comments